ACMA has been criticised
in the past for having too many responsibilities and not being hard enough on
those organisations and individuals who breach the regualtions.
What do you think? Here’s
recent case – the 2DayFM ‘Royal prank’
In December 2012, two
presenters at 2DayFM’s Summer 30 program made a prank telephone call to nurses
at King Edward VII Hospital in London, where the Duchess of Cambridge was was being treated for hyperemesis gravidarum.
The stunt was cleared by 2Day FM lawyers prior to airing. Station officials tried to contact the nurses at least five times prior to broadcasting the stunt. Despite consent not being obtained, the call went to air. Some days later, the nurse at the centre of the prank committed suicide.
The Australian Communications and Media Authority found the
station had breached two clauses of the Commercial Radio Codes of Practice and
committed a criminal offence under the Surveillance Devices Act.
ACMA imposed tougher licence conditions on 2DayFM and will
force the broadcaster to air a special three-hour program to raise awareness
about mental illness and promote "media ethics" in the wake of the
infamous "royal prank" call.
You can find the details of the full investigation here: http://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/Newsroom/Newsroom/Media-releases/2dayfm-royal-prank-broadcast
This is an example of how ACMA can come down hard on a media
organisation. However, then there is this:
Very different outcomes - so
you might think this is not a very strict way of doing things.
But
you must remember that overarching these codes of practice is of course,
legislation; the laws that journalists and media authorities must adhere to.
No comments:
Post a Comment